Legislation Details

File #: RES-38213    Version: 1 Name: Various Cities - Tourism Promotion Area
Type: Resolution Status: Adopted
File created: 3/8/2011 In control: City Council
On agenda: 3/8/2011 Final action: 3/8/2011
Title: Resolution No. 38213
Attachments: 1. RES-38213.pdf
Related files: RES-37886, RES42017
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
Req. #12861 RESOLUTION NO. 3 8 213 A RESOLUTION relating to economic development; authorizing the execution of an Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement for Establishment of Pierce 2 County Tourism Promotion Area to resolve ambiguity in the language relating to the supplanting of funds. 3 4 WHEREAS chapter 35.101 RCW authorizes counties to establish 5 tourism promotion areas to permit the levy of special assessments to be 6 expended exclusively for tourism promotion, and 7 WHEREAS, in March 2009, the operators of lodging businesses located 8 within Pierce County ("County") presented an initiation petition to the Pierce 9 County Council ("County Council") seeking to have the County Council 10 establish a Pierce County Tourism Promotion Area ("TPA"), and I 1 12 WHEREAS, on October 13, 2009, the Tacoma City Council adopted 13 Resolution No. 37886, and on November 24, 2009, the County Council adopted 14 Resolution No. R2009-119, both authorizing the execution of an interlocal 15 agreement ("Agreement") with the cities of DuPont, Fife, Gig Harbor, 16 Lakewood, Puyallup, Sumner, and Tacoma (collectively the "Parties") with the 17 County establishing a TPA to include the collection of special assessments 18 19 from lodging businesses within their respective jurisdictions, and 20 WHEREAS the County is requesting an amendment to the Agreement to 21 clear up ambiguity in the language related to supplanting funds, and 22 WHEREAS the term "supplant" has specific rules under state law that 23 are having unintended consequences in fund distribution, accounting, and 24 auditing, and 25 26 41 Res12861.doc-JHC/1ad LEG 004 (11/89) WHEREAS the County has had several conversations with the state auditor about the administration of the fund, and the Auditor's Office has 2 3 generously assisted in implementing the program, and 4 WHEREAS the Hotel Commission is aware that the County is asking for 5 this change, and 6 WHEREAS, to correct the ambiguity, the amendment will delete the phrase, 7 g, and are not intended to supplant existing funding," in Section 7, paragraph E, of 8 the Agreement, and 9 10 WHEREAS the proposed amendment was presented to the Economic I I Development Committee on February 22, 201 1, and received a "do pass"; Now, 12 Therefore, 1 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TACOMA: 14 That the proper officers of the City are hereby authorized to execute an 1 5 amendment to the Interlocal Agreement for Establishment of Pierce County 16 Tourism Promotion Area to resolve ambiguity in the language relating to the 17 18 supplanting of funds, said document to be substantially in the form of the proposed 19 amendment on file in the office of the City Clerk. 20 Adopted MAR 8 2011 IJNA4-51@2@ - 21 Attest: Mayor 22 23 City Clerk 24 Appr to 25 r 26 DepUFC (ty Xttorney 42 - 2 - Res12861.doc-JHC/1ad LEG 004 (11/89) CITY CLERK USE ONLY REQUEST FOR k64uest IZ8&/ booma n ORDINANCE 0 RESOLUTION Ord-/Res. 38213 1. DATE: February 10, 2011 2. SPONSORED BY: COUNCIL MEMBER(s) N/A (if no sponsor, enter "N/A") 3a. REQUESTING 4a. CONTACT (for questions): PHONE: DEPARTmENT/DmsioN/PRoGRAm Ryan Petty 253-591-5139 Community & Economic Development 3b. "Do PASS" FROM Economic 4b. Person Presenting: PHONE: Development Committee Ryan Petty 253-591-5139 NYes No To Committee as information only 4c. ATTORNEY: PHONE: Did not go before a Committee 253-591-5638 3c. DID THIS ITEM GO BEFORE THE Jeff Capell PUBLIC UTILITY BOARD? Yes, on Notrequired N/A DepaftmentDir Division Budget Officer/Finance Director Ci 5. REQUESTED COUNCIL DATE: March 8, 201 1 6. SummARY AGENDA TITLE: (A concise sentence, as it will appear on the Council agenda.) Authorizing execution of an amendment to the Interlocal Agreement for establishment of Pierce County Tourism Promotion Area to resolve ambiguity in language. 7. BACKGROUND INFORMATioN/GENERAL DISCUSSION: (Why is this request necessary? Are there legal requirements? What are the viable alternatives? Who has been involved in the process?) In November, 2009 Pierce County Council approved Resolution No. R2009-119 which authorized the County Executive to enter into an Interlocal Agreement with the cities of DuPont, Fife, Gig Harbor, Lakewood, Puyallup, Sumner and Tacoma for the establishment of a Pierce County Tourism Promotion Area (TPA) pursuant to RCW 35.101. This RCW authorizes the levy of special assessments to fund tourism promotion upon receipt of a petition requesting the creation of a TPA from people who represent the hotel rooms that would be subject o the special assessment. Pierce County received such a petition that was signed by individuals representing at least 60% of the hotel rooms within the TPA area. The Interlocal Agreement was approved by Tacoma City Council in October, 2009. The County has requested an amendment to the agreement to clear up ambiguity in the language related to supplanting funds. The term "supplant" has specific rules under State law that are having unintended consequences in fund distribution, accounting, and auditing. The County has had several conversations with the State Auditor about the administration of the fund and the Auditor's Office has generously assisted in implementing the program. The Hotel Commission is aware that the County is asking for this change. To correct the ambiguity, the amendment will delete the phrase "and are not intended to supplant existing funding" in Section 7, paragraph E of the TPA Agreement. This topic is scheduled to come before the Economic Development Committee on February 22, 201 1. A C1 Li -11 cotclerk\fortns\RequestResolutionOrdinance.doc Office of the City Clerk (01/0 7/2 01 1) CITY CLERK USE ONLY REQUEST (CONT) Request #: I Ord/Res 3 82 1 h 77771 t) 8. LIST ALL MATERIAL AVAILABLE AS BACKUP INFORMATION FOR THE REQUEST AND INDICATE WHERE FILED: Source Documents/Backup Material Location of Document Pierce County Resolution R2009-119 City Clerk's Office Interlocal Agreement City Clerk's Office Amendment to Interlocal Agreement City Clerk's Office Resolution 37886 City Clerk's Office 9. WHICHOFTHECITY'SSTRATEGicGoALsDOEsTHISITEMSUPPORT?(CHECKTHEGOALTHATBESTAPPLIES) A. F-1 A SAFE, CLEAN AND ATTRACTIVE COMMUNITY B. A DIVERSE, PRODUCTIVE AND SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY C. A HIGH-PERFORMING, OPEN AND ENGAGED GOVERNMENT 10. IF THIS CONTRACT IS FOR AN AMOUNT OF $200,000 OR LESS, EXPLAIN WHY IT NEEDS LEGISLATIVE APPROVAL: Amendment of agreement previously approved by Council. 11. FINANCIAL IMPACT: EXPENDITURE R REVENUE A. No IMPACT (NO FISCAL NOTE) B. F@ YES, OVER $1 00,000, Fiscal Note Attached C. F@ YES, UNDER $1 00,000, (NO FISCAL NOTE) Provide funding source information below: FUNDING SOURCE: (Enter amount of funding from each source) Fund Number & Name: State $ city $ Other $ Total Amount If an expenditure, is it budgeted? F@ Yes r-1 No Where? Cost Center: Aect 4d cotclerk@forms\RequestResolutionOrdinance.doc Office of the City Clerk (01/07/2011) 41 __,@ ripoll! p7i@@.A bcmla City of Tacoma Memorandum TO: Eric Anderson, City Manager FROM: Ryan Petty, Director Community and Econo ent SUBJECT: Proposed Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement for Establishment of the Pierce County Tourism Promotion Area, Request No. 12861 on Council's March 8,2011, Agenda DATE: March 1, 2011 Background The proposed amendment would remove language from the above referenced agreement which Council authorized be executed in its meeting of October 13, 2009. The specific language is a phrase indicating that the agreement was "not intended to supplant existing funding." Because the language has been found by the State Auditor to be ambiguous, it has proven difficult to administer, requiring segregation of old and new funding, pre- and post-agreement. For the future, administration will become more difficult, the effect of compounding of complexity over time. Pierce County, as the party administrating the agreement and responsible for accounting for the funds, has requested this amendment, urged forward by their Director of Economic Development, Denise Dyer. All funding partners, including the Hotel Commission (advisory to Pierce County and consisting primarily of representatives of the Hotel community who are assessed the relevant fees) remain committed to the agreement and to the continued funding of the Tacoma-Pierce County Convention and Visitors Bureau. Recommendation The authorization to amend the agreement received a "do pass" from the Economic Development Committee on February 22, 201 1. 45 3 82 13 Resolution No. Adopted: MAR - A mi Maker of Motion: Seconded: LJO Voice Vote: MEMBERS AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT Mr. Boe Mr. Campbell Mr. --ey Mr. Lon@@@- Mr. Manthou Mr. Mello Ms. Walker Ms. Woodards Mayor Strickland Roll Call Vote: MEMBERS AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT Mr. Boe Mr. CaTpbell Mr. Fey Mr. Lonf@rgan Mr. Manthou Mr. Mello Ms. Walker Ms. Woodards Mayor Strickland iAccagendMagenda procedures and formsVesolutionvotingrecorddoc